<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: President Obama responds to &#8216;Public Option Cave&#8217; Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailydose.us/2009/07/07/is-white-house-showing-its-chin-or-shadowboxing-on-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/07/07/is-white-house-showing-its-chin-or-shadowboxing-on-public-option/</link>
	<description>Tommy Christopher&#039;s Daily Dose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 05:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmm&#8230;Does the President Support the Public Option? &#171; Daily Dose</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/07/07/is-white-house-showing-its-chin-or-shadowboxing-on-public-option/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hmmm&#8230;Does the President Support the Public Option? &#171; Daily Dose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=2172#comment-4438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is nothing new for the mainstream media, who have taken, or created, every opportunity they can to declare the public option [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is nothing new for the mainstream media, who have taken, or created, every opportunity they can to declare the public option [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Eager to Report Death of Public Option &#171; Daily Dose</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/07/07/is-white-house-showing-its-chin-or-shadowboxing-on-public-option/#comment-4287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media Eager to Report Death of Public Option &#171; Daily Dose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=2172#comment-4287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stick a fork in the public option since this debate began.  Off the top of my head, there was this July report that Rahm Emanuel had &#8220;caved&#8221; on the public option by answering this very question.  That story was quickly walked back by the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stick a fork in the public option since this debate began.  Off the top of my head, there was this July report that Rahm Emanuel had &#8220;caved&#8221; on the public option by answering this very question.  That story was quickly walked back by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Obama v Gang of Six: 7 People, 1 Spine &#171; Daily Dose</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/07/07/is-white-house-showing-its-chin-or-shadowboxing-on-public-option/#comment-4113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[President Obama v Gang of Six: 7 People, 1 Spine &#171; Daily Dose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=2172#comment-4113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] when I urged my pal, Lee Stranahan, to relax (while continuing his excellent work) about the President&#8217;s urging to stop attacking Blue [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when I urged my pal, Lee Stranahan, to relax (while continuing his excellent work) about the President&#8217;s urging to stop attacking Blue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulisesjorge</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/07/07/is-white-house-showing-its-chin-or-shadowboxing-on-public-option/#comment-3984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ulisesjorge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=2172#comment-3984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. C,

Do you know about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba662&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;?

&lt;blockquote&gt;The 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports show the combined unfunded liability of these two programs has reached nearly $107 trillion in today&#039;s dollars!  That is about seven times the size of the U.S. economy and 10 times the size of the outstanding national debt.

The unfunded liability is the difference between the benefits that have been promised to current and future retirees and what will be collected in dedicated taxes and Medicare premiums.  Last year alone, this debt rose by $5 trillion.  If no other reform is enacted, this funding gap can only be closed in future years by substantial tax increases, large benefit cuts or both.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, Medicare and social security are broke.  You still insist that it would be a great idea for the government to expand its role in providing medical services with a &quot;public option&quot;.  I don&#039;t really understand in what kind of fantasyland are you living in.  What is the rationale? Will the &quot;public option&quot; be self-financed by the premiums paid into it?  Or will it be financed the same was as the &quot;stimulus&quot; package with our children and grandchildren money?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. C,</p>
<p>Do you know about <a href="http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba662" rel="nofollow">this</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>The 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports show the combined unfunded liability of these two programs has reached nearly $107 trillion in today&#8217;s dollars!  That is about seven times the size of the U.S. economy and 10 times the size of the outstanding national debt.</p>
<p>The unfunded liability is the difference between the benefits that have been promised to current and future retirees and what will be collected in dedicated taxes and Medicare premiums.  Last year alone, this debt rose by $5 trillion.  If no other reform is enacted, this funding gap can only be closed in future years by substantial tax increases, large benefit cuts or both.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, Medicare and social security are broke.  You still insist that it would be a great idea for the government to expand its role in providing medical services with a &#8220;public option&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t really understand in what kind of fantasyland are you living in.  What is the rationale? Will the &#8220;public option&#8221; be self-financed by the premiums paid into it?  Or will it be financed the same was as the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; package with our children and grandchildren money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

