<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOMA Defense &#8216;Apology&#8217; Should Have Come From Top of White House Ladder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailydose.us/2009/06/21/doma-defense-apology-should-have-come-from-top-of-white-house-ladder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/21/doma-defense-apology-should-have-come-from-top-of-white-house-ladder/</link>
	<description>Tommy Christopher&#039;s Daily Dose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulisesjorge</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/21/doma-defense-apology-should-have-come-from-top-of-white-house-ladder/#comment-3635</link>
		<dc:creator>ulisesjorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=1873#comment-3635</guid>
		<description>I really fail to see where the white house is going with this.  I pledge ignorance; I’m a computer guy, not a lawyer.  But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americablog.com/2009/06/choice-to-defend-doma-and-its.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Richard Socarides&lt;/a&gt; is a law guy and he said the white house had a choice and the DOJ did not have to defend DOMA.

Well, let&#039;s assume that the DOJ really have to defend DOMA.  I&#039;ve commented before, the democrats control congress and the WH.  Why not repeal DOMA (and DADT while you&#039;re at it)?  Republicans will filibuster in the senate? Probably, and they might get a blue dog or two, but at least the ball will be in their court and democrats could say to one of their most faithful voting bloc that they tried, but these republicans didn&#039;t let us, so help us along so we can get a filibuster-proof majority in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really fail to see where the white house is going with this.  I pledge ignorance; I’m a computer guy, not a lawyer.  But <a href="http://www.americablog.com/2009/06/choice-to-defend-doma-and-its.html" rel="nofollow">Richard Socarides</a> is a law guy and he said the white house had a choice and the DOJ did not have to defend DOMA.</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s assume that the DOJ really have to defend DOMA.  I&#8217;ve commented before, the democrats control congress and the WH.  Why not repeal DOMA (and DADT while you&#8217;re at it)?  Republicans will filibuster in the senate? Probably, and they might get a blue dog or two, but at least the ball will be in their court and democrats could say to one of their most faithful voting bloc that they tried, but these republicans didn&#8217;t let us, so help us along so we can get a filibuster-proof majority in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis IX KingofFrawnce</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/21/doma-defense-apology-should-have-come-from-top-of-white-house-ladder/#comment-3632</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis IX KingofFrawnce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=1873#comment-3632</guid>
		<description>&quot;.....if y&#039;all don&#039;t.......&quot;
spellcheck called .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;..if y&#8217;all don&#8217;t&#8230;&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
spellcheck called .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis IX KingofFrawnce</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/21/doma-defense-apology-should-have-come-from-top-of-white-house-ladder/#comment-3631</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis IX KingofFrawnce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=1873#comment-3631</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not incest is y&#039;all don&#039;t have the same parents, and it&#039;s not not gay unless y&#039;all kiss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not incest is y&#8217;all don&#8217;t have the same parents, and it&#8217;s not not gay unless y&#8217;all kiss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cube</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/21/doma-defense-apology-should-have-come-from-top-of-white-house-ladder/#comment-3630</link>
		<dc:creator>Cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=1873#comment-3630</guid>
		<description>You need to go to Iran.  Marry a cousin.  Then come to LA,.  Then the courts will recognize it.  Unless and until the decision gets reversed.  Considering Iran is not a &quot;state&quot; I think the court erred.  Nevertheless, one ought use the case to argue from absurdity to prove a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to go to Iran.  Marry a cousin.  Then come to LA,.  Then the courts will recognize it.  Unless and until the decision gets reversed.  Considering Iran is not a &#8220;state&#8221; I think the court erred.  Nevertheless, one ought use the case to argue from absurdity to prove a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cube</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/21/doma-defense-apology-should-have-come-from-top-of-white-house-ladder/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>Cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=1873#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>Kissin&#039; Cousins rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kissin&#8217; Cousins rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xanadu Xero</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/21/doma-defense-apology-should-have-come-from-top-of-white-house-ladder/#comment-3628</link>
		<dc:creator>Xanadu Xero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailydose.us/?p=1873#comment-3628</guid>
		<description>You mean I could marry my brother but not my sister?  OMG my daughter&#039;s going to teach there this year!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean I could marry my brother but not my sister?  OMG my daughter&#8217;s going to teach there this year!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
