<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Kos Founder Twitter-Feuds with Meghan McCain Over Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/</link>
	<description>Tommy Christopher&#039;s Daily Dose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Christopher</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2783</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>No, and I&#039;m not going to argue this endlessly.  My statements are what they are.  Argument by extension is intellectually dishonest, and a waste of my time.  I said Benen was wrong, and why. I said Markos was wrong, and why.  Those reasons do not extend beyond those examples, because there are infinite variables beyond them.

In fact, the quote you&#039;re trying to pick apart explicitly belies your interpretation, as I denounce Perez Hilton right in it.  Hilton &quot;works for equality,&quot; but in an entirely counterproductive fashion.

You also utterly fail to account for Markos&#039; attacking Meg without even having read Benen&#039;s piece, and you ascribe context to Benen&#039;s statement about Meg that simply is not there.

If you have more to say about this, go blog it out at DKos, shoot me the link, and maybe I&#039;ll do a post about it.  At least then, we both get some content out of your pointless apologism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, and I&#8217;m not going to argue this endlessly.  My statements are what they are.  Argument by extension is intellectually dishonest, and a waste of my time.  I said Benen was wrong, and why. I said Markos was wrong, and why.  Those reasons do not extend beyond those examples, because there are infinite variables beyond them.</p>
<p>In fact, the quote you&#8217;re trying to pick apart explicitly belies your interpretation, as I denounce Perez Hilton right in it.  Hilton &#8220;works for equality,&#8221; but in an entirely counterproductive fashion.</p>
<p>You also utterly fail to account for Markos&#8217; attacking Meg without even having read Benen&#8217;s piece, and you ascribe context to Benen&#8217;s statement about Meg that simply is not there.</p>
<p>If you have more to say about this, go blog it out at DKos, shoot me the link, and maybe I&#8217;ll do a post about it.  At least then, we both get some content out of your pointless apologism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Mahan</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Mahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I meant “Meg has done more than most to publicize marriage equality, and not in the ugly, Perez Hilton way. To call her meaningless, or all of the other non-Dick people who work hard to achieve equality for everyone, is just wrong.” That was a critique of the spiritual and factual accuracy of the Washington Monthly writer’s statement.&lt;/I&gt;

Yes, it was a critique. It also says that calling anyone who works for equality* meaningless is wrong. 

*Which would include Steve Benen and Markos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I meant “Meg has done more than most to publicize marriage equality, and not in the ugly, Perez Hilton way. To call her meaningless, or all of the other non-Dick people who work hard to achieve equality for everyone, is just wrong.” That was a critique of the spiritual and factual accuracy of the Washington Monthly writer’s statement.</i></p>
<p>Yes, it was a critique. It also says that calling anyone who works for equality* meaningless is wrong. </p>
<p>*Which would include Steve Benen and Markos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulisesjorge</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>ulisesjorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;I’ll jump in for just a second: I don’t care if the only reason Meghan gets the soapbox is because she has a famous last name. The point is that she is using that soapbox very effectively for the betterment of a class of people that her party has long scorned.
By bringing attention to marriage equality and using her famous name for good she is doing more &lt;b&gt;than most people with famous names&quot;&lt;/b&gt;.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You know, that&#039;s true.  I’m thinking about &quot;moderate republican&quot; Collin Powell.  Does anyone know where he stands on gay marriage?  Abortion?

*&lt;i&gt;crickets chirping&lt;/i&gt;*


Yeah, neither do I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
&#8220;I’ll jump in for just a second: I don’t care if the only reason Meghan gets the soapbox is because she has a famous last name. The point is that she is using that soapbox very effectively for the betterment of a class of people that her party has long scorned.<br />
By bringing attention to marriage equality and using her famous name for good she is doing more <b>than most people with famous names&#8221;</b>.
</p></blockquote>
<p>You know, that&#8217;s true.  I’m thinking about &#8220;moderate republican&#8221; Collin Powell.  Does anyone know where he stands on gay marriage?  Abortion?</p>
<p>*<i>crickets chirping</i>*</p>
<p>Yeah, neither do I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Christopher</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2777</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2777</guid>
		<description>That was almost my favorite quote of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was almost my favorite quote of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Christopher</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>I meant “Meg has done more than most to publicize marriage equality, and not in the ugly, Perez Hilton way. To call her meaningless, or all of the other non-Dick people who work hard to achieve equality for everyone, is just wrong.”  That was a critique of the spiritual and factual accuracy of the Washington Monthly writer&#039;s statement.

As for Markos, I meant, again, what I said.  He didn&#039;t slam her for disagreeing with his position, he slammed her&lt;em&gt; in spite of her agreement with him&lt;/em&gt; on an issue that is supposed to matter to him, for no other reason than to put her in her place.  He &lt;em&gt;hadn&#039;t even read the piece he slammed her about.  &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant “Meg has done more than most to publicize marriage equality, and not in the ugly, Perez Hilton way. To call her meaningless, or all of the other non-Dick people who work hard to achieve equality for everyone, is just wrong.”  That was a critique of the spiritual and factual accuracy of the Washington Monthly writer&#8217;s statement.</p>
<p>As for Markos, I meant, again, what I said.  He didn&#8217;t slam her for disagreeing with his position, he slammed her<em> in spite of her agreement with him</em> on an issue that is supposed to matter to him, for no other reason than to put her in her place.  He <em>hadn&#8217;t even read the piece he slammed her about.  </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Mahan</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2774</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Mahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2774</guid>
		<description>Really? All that&#039;s being said here is that if Dick Cheney, the former vice-president of the United States, speaks out for something, it&#039;s more significant than when Meghan McCain does. Look, saying that Meghan McCain is less important than Dick Cheney doesn&#039;t devalue her voice. Saying that Meghan McCain is less important than Dick Cheney is stating the bloody obvious.

So yes, Meghan McCain is simply picking a fight. So are you, as a matter of fact, by focusing on the bigger name rather than say, the person who actually &lt;I&gt;wrote&lt;/I&gt; the words you posted at the top. 

&lt;I&gt;Straw man alert “it’s wrong to slam people who agree with your positions” Never said anything like that. Read it again.&lt;/I&gt;

Alright:  &quot;Meg has done more than most to publicize marriage equality, and not in the ugly, Perez Hilton way.  To call her meaningless, or all of the other non-Dick people who work hard to achieve equality for everyone, is just &lt;B&gt;wrong&lt;/B&gt;.&quot;

If that&#039;s not saying it&#039;s wrong to slam anyone who works for gay marriage, I would truly love to hear what you meant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? All that&#8217;s being said here is that if Dick Cheney, the former vice-president of the United States, speaks out for something, it&#8217;s more significant than when Meghan McCain does. Look, saying that Meghan McCain is less important than Dick Cheney doesn&#8217;t devalue her voice. Saying that Meghan McCain is less important than Dick Cheney is stating the bloody obvious.</p>
<p>So yes, Meghan McCain is simply picking a fight. So are you, as a matter of fact, by focusing on the bigger name rather than say, the person who actually <i>wrote</i> the words you posted at the top. </p>
<p><i>Straw man alert “it’s wrong to slam people who agree with your positions” Never said anything like that. Read it again.</i></p>
<p>Alright:  &#8220;Meg has done more than most to publicize marriage equality, and not in the ugly, Perez Hilton way.  To call her meaningless, or all of the other non-Dick people who work hard to achieve equality for everyone, is just <b>wrong</b>.&#8221;</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s not saying it&#8217;s wrong to slam anyone who works for gay marriage, I would truly love to hear what you meant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Villanueva</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2772</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Villanueva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2772</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I’m a bigger attention-whore than the spawn of a peacock and a firefly riding bareback on a blowfish, but there are issues that are bigger than my ego.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

This? Is fucking epic imagery. (Reminds me of a quote: &quot;If there&#039;s anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot immediately.&quot;)

On-topic: Oh, internet. e_e;;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I’m a bigger attention-whore than the spawn of a peacock and a firefly riding bareback on a blowfish, but there are issues that are bigger than my ego.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>This? Is fucking epic imagery. (Reminds me of a quote: &#8220;If there&#8217;s anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot immediately.&#8221;)</p>
<p>On-topic: Oh, internet. e_e;;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The College Politico &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Required Daily Reading</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>The College Politico &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Required Daily Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>[...] The Daily Kos and Megan McCain fight about who the bigger gay marriage proponent is&#8230; PLUS: Tommy Christopher throws his two cents at Markos! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Daily Kos and Megan McCain fight about who the bigger gay marriage proponent is&#8230; PLUS: Tommy Christopher throws his two cents at Markos! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassi</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>I love Meghan McCain.  She&#039;s very real, not just party-line. People will have to pay attention to her in the future I truly believe.  She may not be the present, but she&#039;s the future and thats very very meaningful in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Meghan McCain.  She&#8217;s very real, not just party-line. People will have to pay attention to her in the future I truly believe.  She may not be the present, but she&#8217;s the future and thats very very meaningful in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Christopher</title>
		<link>http://dailydose.us/2009/06/02/daily-kos-founder-twitter-feuds-with-meghan-mccain-over-gay-marriage/#comment-2758</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommychristopher.wordpress.com/?p=1482#comment-2758</guid>
		<description>Straw man alert &quot;it’s wrong to slam people who agree with your positions&quot; Never said anything like that. Read it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straw man alert &#8220;it’s wrong to slam people who agree with your positions&#8221; Never said anything like that. Read it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
